Up to 87% relative improvement across selected liberation and selectivity indicators.
Evidence
Follow the particle, not just the power meter.
CoreBurst™ is evaluated according to whether it creates a more valuable particle population: better-exposed minerals, cleaner gangue separation and fewer problematic ultra-fines.
Interpretation
A disciplined evidence hierarchy.
Strong mineralogical signals justify the next stage of testing. They do not replace flotation, recovery, energy, CO₂-balance and continuous-flow validation.
Critical-Mineral Liberation
Improved exposure in a complex nickel-bearing ore.
Comparative mineral-liberation analysis showed that CoreBurst™ created materially different target-mineral and gangue associations than a conventional milling baseline.
Evidence of useful mineral exposure without relying only on finer particle production.
Improved separation indicators between the target mineral and gangue population.
These mineralogical indicators do not constitute a guaranteed plant recovery increase.
Mineralization
A measurable carbon signal—and a clear path to verification.
Reactive ultramafic material processed under non-optimized conditions showed an elemental-carbon increase and higher carbonate-bearing mineral inventories than a conventional baseline.
18.3 kg CO₂/t equivalent
A 0.5 wt% elemental-carbon increase observed in a selected fine fraction, with a hydrated magnesium carbonate phase indicated.
26.6 kg CO₂/t equivalent
A mass-weighted stoichiometric calculation based on incremental carbonate-bearing mineral inventory.
Neither value is a certified net-removal claim. Closed-loop accounting, carbon speciation, lifecycle analysis and independent MRV remain required.
Technical Foundation
